top of page
Recent Posts
Search

Demystifying Kona Qualification Myths

  • Writer: Jason Lentzke
    Jason Lentzke
  • 2 hours ago
  • 2 min read

After nearly two decades of coaching Kona Qualifiers—and just as many athletes chasing it—there are a few myths that come up over and over again. They sound logical. They’re often repeated. And they’re usually wrong.


Let’s clear a few things up.


Ali'i Drive
Ali'i Drive

Myth #1: “I need to lose weight to improve my watts/kg.”


Reality:

Most athletes don’t need to lose weight—they need to increase FTP.


Chasing weight loss often:


Reduces training quality,

Compromises recovery and hormones,

Hurts run durability,


When FTP improves through consistent training, fueling, and recovery, watts/kg almost always improve as a byproduct. That’s the sustainable path.


Also important: every Kona qualifier has a unique body morphology. There is no single “Kona body.” Tall, short, lean, powerful—successful athletes come in many forms. Don’t fall into the Instagram Catwalk Trap, where aesthetics get confused with performance.

FUEL THE WORK


Weight matters—but it’s secondary, gradual, and never worth sacrificing power, health, or run execution.


Myth #2: “Kona Q is about riding huge watts.”


Reality:

Kona Q is about riding the right watts.


Athletes miss Kona spots every year because they:


Exceed power ceilings,

Burn matches early,

Brag about bike splits… then walk the marathon,


Kona qualification is won by athletes who:


Pace with discipline,

Stay within physiological limits,

Arrive at the run ready to execute,


The run decides the day.


Myth #3: “If my bike is weak, I can’t qualify.”


Reality:

Every athlete has a bias—and the bike is often a symptom, not the root issue.


Strong runners often struggle initially with the concentric demands of cycling,

Strong cyclists often underestimate the cost of poor run execution,


Here’s what many athletes miss:


If your bike feels weak, chances are your swim is also underdeveloped.


Under-committing to the swim often means:


Higher HR exiting the water,

Carrying tension onto the bike,

Less stable power early,


When athletes commit to the swim with the same intent as the bike, the ROI is massive:


Lower HR onto the bike,

Better posture and breathing,

More stable power,

Less early glycogen burn,


With time:


The bike becomes a weapon,

The run becomes the deciding factor,


Myth #4: “More volume is the answer.”


Reality:

More volume without precision just creates fatigue.


Kona-worthy athletes don’t just train more—they:


Hit the right workloads (kilojoules > miles),

Fuel consistently,

Respect recovery,

Protect key run sessions,


Execution beats excess.


Myth #5: “Gear upgrades will close the gap.”


Reality:

Your bike generates 0% of the power.


Aerodynamics and fit matter—but no wheelset or 3D printed cockpit fixes:


Poor pacing,

Low FTP,

Underfueling,

Run blowups,


The best investment is still the engine—and the decisions behind it.


Bottom Line


Kona Qualification isn’t about being the lightest, strongest, or flashiest athlete.


It’s about:


Increasing FTP intelligently,

Respecting individual physiology,

Committing to the swim,

Pacing with discipline,

Fueling adequately,

Letting your run skillset seal the deal,


Race IQ > ego. Execution > obsession.


Toro Ladies
Toro Ladies 2025


 
 
 

Comments


Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Archive
Search By Tags
Follow Jason
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • 48
  • Facebook Social Icon
bottom of page